We Name and Shame the Guilty Parties

Can you help?

More information required ... Can you help?

Vigilante writes ...

We often get reports that we cannot publish without corroboration. These are usually accusations against people, companies or government bodies. Naturally, there's no point in asking the accused for a statement as they will invariably wheel out their professional liars and the truth will be denied or covered up ... or both*. Instead, we ask for your help.

Listed below are brief details of some of our pending articles. If you've had any similar experiences with these individuals or organisations, please submit a contact form or complete the form at the bottom of this page and let us know. We will respect your anonymity.

* Read this article to see how they do it.

Common Purpose

Does your company use training courses run by an educational charity called Common Purpose? Have you come across the expression at work? Have you noticed other expressions like 'neurological linguistic control', 'diversity', 'stakeholders' or 'reframing' being used more often? If so, we would like to hear from you. Please contact us.

University College Hospital, London

A lady from London claims she had an illegal c-section done by two doctors who forced her into a theatre against her will. The doctors said they had the patient's consent even though they admitted she was sleeping when they obtained it. After battling with UCH for 3 years, they still refuted the allegations and refused to mediate, instead preferring the lady to litigate against them. It is estimated such action would cost the NHS £50,000 to defend yet they are not prepared to mediate.

If this is the kind of money the NHS is prepared to waste, no wonder they are in such a state. Does anybody else have information about similar malpractices at UCH? If so, please contact us.

Pension credits - DWP

We have a report from a couple in Berkshire who are executors for their late uncle. Their problem is that the DWP is demanding repayment of all their uncle's pension credits from 2003 to 2007 - a sum of around £10,000 - on the grounds that he was overpaid.

Initial research reveals that if there were any overpayments they were entirely the fault of the DWP and are, therefore, not recoverable. We think it is a disgraceful situation when the government go out of their way to get pensioners on the Pension Credits hook, subject them to a means test, cock-up the calculations and then try to recover the money, especially when the recipient has passed away. Has anyone else had similar experiences? If so, please contact us.

Your Comments

Please complete the boxes below (those marked ** are essential) then click "Submit".

Please Note: Your contact details are treated in total confidence. They are never passed to any other persons or used for any other purpose than communications between us.
 
Your name: **
Email address: **
Telephone:
Town/City: **
Additional comments:

 
Please tell us about your experiences
We value your feedback
If you want to publicise any unjust practises that have affected you, please use our contact form.
If you want to add comments about any of our published articles, use the form below the article. This also gives you the opportunity to vote - a new feature on our website.

 

 

[Home] ● [Top of page]

  



Subscribe free
to our RSS
news feeds
(What is RSS?)
↑

 

www.name-n-shame.co.uk                         Copyright © 2002 Name and Shame                         Last updated: 14 November 2008